nooutlet wrote:The reason that going over 1024 to 1200 for a default size is ridiculous is because 70% of the users of W3Schools would then have to scroll to see all of the image EVERY TIME they went to an image page that had that size.
Well when it comes to "ridiculous" that statement's in the running.
Most images on pBase will fit into 1000 pixels. If the default
limit,
limit I repeat, was 1200, how much scrolling would be involved
for the majority of images? A great, fat whopping dollop of none at all. Not only will they not have to scroll, they won't even KNOW that there's a 1200 pixel default limit. It's not as if images which are under 1200 would be resized UP to that as a default.
Yes, if the user was running at 1024 * 768 and came across a
relatively rare 1100 pixel wide image, they'd have to scroll. A little. And yet, if they didn't want to, they'd still see the overwhelming majority of the image on their screen.
The objective here is to avoid, and avoid for as long as possible, the unwanted, undesired, irritating, photo distorting, arbitrary restriction that pBase imposed as the default size god knows how many years ago when people were still using steam powered monitors.
I repeat; the intention of making the default limit 1200... not making images resized UP to 1200, mark you, but making the default
LIMIT 1200, is that not only will it reduce the number of photos that are seen in a way that the photographer doesn't want, but will CONTINUE to do so for at least 2 or 3 years.
And yes, I know that the 800*600 numbers aren't necessarily "linear". My own stats show that the 800*600 brigade isn't merely under 10%, it's under 5. I doubt that I'm alone in this amongst pBase gallery owners. The percentage of people who "just have a computer for e-mail" who are still on that resolution may be higher, but that's not really relevant for pBase gallery owners.
Last edited by akmc_in_au on Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.