mikelong wrote:The new slideshow rocks, much easier using SLIDESHOW(gallery) than messing around with all that code like before. I am curious, however, why my home page formats better with Firefox than IE.
Mike Long Photography
I agree with you about Chris's flexible, easy-to-use slideshow feature !
Anyway, IE, for reasons unknown to me (others may know though),
interprets differently the Table width of '800' (pixels) in Luis's code
I made two changes in an editor (to change 800 pixels option
to 80% of screen instead) to see what that would do.
==============================================
- At the beginning of your user-description box in edit-gallery, you have:
--- <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=800 border=0>
--- Change that to:
----- <TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=85% border=0>
- A few lines down in Luis' table, you have
--- <TABLE class=luis cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=800 border=0>
--- Change that to:
----- <TABLE class=luis cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=85% border=0>
==============================================
IE interprets percentage-width better than it does pixel statements from
what I can see, and percentage-widths are more flexible for different
sizes of screens.
Also, to see what the table widths really look like when testing,
change the "border=0" to "border=1" to get a better idea of how much
each table-data-cell has.
Then change them back to "border=0" to have a cleaner look.
See if that works for you. Could be just my setup...