fishit wrote:Feel better now? To each his/her own. I sell via multi ways of marketing and have made some good money off search engines, sorry that has not worked for you.
People looking for a place or thing find my PBase site and look at it and buy pictures related to the search. In the past I provided prints off my printing service website.
I started looking for a site with print option included and found both smugmug and zenfolio as options, after reading and trying both it was clear smugmug had major advanatges.
PBase has always been for fun and work and not my main website for showing my photography, I use many sites to do that as well as some art shows and publications.
I understand PBase's short comings but I see the advantages to the PBase and the community, neither one of those things I have found else where are quite as good as here.
Having other more stable website locations just makes sense no matter what your marketing plan is with photography, if you are happy where you are at great, I am happy for you.
But to return here and to repeatedly beat a dead horse of your displeasure of the service here at PBase makes no real sense other than to allow you to vent your frustration and trash the owners.
You have made your choice you have moved your pictures and left behind notice where you have gone, why do you feel the need to harp on the current short comings of PBase after the fact makes no sense.
But if it makes you feel better, have at it while you enjoy your new home.
This is what bothers me. Someone like lars or myself raises valid concerns and asks for a simple reply from administrators and instead of the admins stepping in and cooling the waters, we get criticized by other site members. I know your reply is very friendly, Dennis. But I can tell you right now why this is a bad situation overall..
1. The number of people wanting resolution to the statistics problem is large so when someone comes along and minimizes our issues (not necessarily you, but those who don't care about it or those who *think* that it is working fine when the admins themselves admitted problems STILL exist), and the moderators and administrators let the status quo exist, it pretty much illustrates that there is not much concern by the admins to address them nor is there much concern in calming the community waters. Most of us have been friends or acquiaintances and commented on each others' photos at one time or another. PBase can easily fix this problem by making a schedule and then sticking to it, or at least giving us an update if the ETA is passed and say, "We're working on it but need another week, or two more weeks;" whatever it is that the programmers decide it will take to either fix the problems or implement feature X.
Before I became a professional photographer I was (and still am) a C, C++, PHP (and other historical processing languages such as Perl and sed/awk) software developer and have dabbled somewhat into Web 2.0 technologies. I know the development cycle quite well and have been involved from conception to delivery of software products (e.g. my most notable standalone product was CNet Amiga Bulletin Board software versions 4 and 5). This is why I have the experienced opinion that there is not enough communication. I know that unforseen programming issues can arise but I can also tell you that if our work overshot a milestone, I gave my customers/community a public update as once you surpass a milestone, everything beyond that has to shift. That's called being professional and courteous. It leads me to wonder if programming the site is a hobby for someone or if they are being paid.. Paid people should have certain expectations put upon them. I am not saying anything about the programmers' abilities, just asking informed questions and making educated statements. I may not be inside Slug's head nor the programmers' heads, but I do know how to develop, market and sell a successful software product, web-based or otherwise.
2. The PBase model works for you. I looked at your work and it, like mine and so many others, it is top notch. I'm happy your are getting sales. The model is *somewhat* working for me too as Google analytics tells me that 19.5% of traffic to my commercial website comes from PBase referral, but I am hoping to help Slug and Emily increase that it, by being vocal publically and attempting to keep them to their word.
My issue is that without the content filtering system, only those who either already know from BEFORE my gallery was removed from "public galleries" or people browing the member list sees the work of those who create artistic nudes. Not even those who WANT to see it can see it in public areas. The content filter would fix that. It can be as simple as Flickr's 3 state (safe, moderate, restricted) user-moderated flag system with periodic reviews or it can be as siple as a "work-safe" flag. PBase could make ALL parties happy by simply acting like professionals and giving us a timeframe for what they promised. In my humble opinion it is far from dead and I will continue to lobby for it. I'm sorry you see it as beating a dead horse. We don't have to become enemies and resort to insult when we disagree. Simply agree to disagree while letting the site owners know what it is we all want.
Is this where we all sing Kumbaya?
