Board index Photography Artistic Questions The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Artistic Questions

The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Discuss style and artistic aspects of photography
genghis45
 
Posts: 5154

The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Post Mon May 25, 2009 7:49 pm


Image

"AFFABLE"




Although street photography has included subject matter such as the environs on and around streets, the subjects of greatest interest have traditionally been people, for good reason. The moments when strangers on the street are spontaneously caught by street photographers engaged in the acts of living out their lives, provide the emotional content that is not possible in other genres of photography. It is the human condition, human faces and to some extent human body language, that reveal this emotional content in a photographic freeze of those moments. It is imperative that street photography feature strangers, rather than friends or family members who are expecting a portaiture approach. Photography of strangers who aren't expecting to be photographed, generates the emotional impact in the street photo, so prized by street photographers. Ideally, a connection is made between the photographer and his or her street subject, that is spontaneous and real. This can be characterized as an emotional bond of sorts. That's why I personally find studio photography of people so boring, because they inevitably result in a predictably artificial response in subjects, that is devoid of spontaneity. Spontaneity is street photography's secret ingredient. The posed picture is the enemy of spontaneous emoting in subjects. The capture of unknown people who are completely unaware of the photographic act can be exhilirating to view. Equally exhilirating, are street pictures of people who realize at the instant of shutter activation, that they are being photographed. This realization reveals the whole spectrum of emotions in this latter category, from anger to delight. The fact that photography of these people takes place at extremely close ranges that are dictated by the use of wide angle lenses, magnifies the interest in these pictures because of the intimacy that is conveyed by the photographs.

"Affable" is an example of a subject photographed at extremely close range with a wide angle lens (20mm), where the subject realized at the very last instant when I made the exposure, that I was photographing her--hence the title. I was two and a half feet from this woman when I tripped the shutter. As you can see, the subject was completely affable at the moment that she knew that I was taking her picture. To me, the spontaneous reaction that I elicited from this subject, is worth more than a hundred posed pictures of the same woman in poses. Her reaction is as real as the moment is unrehearsed. A viewer of the photograph can almost hear the thoughts flash through her mind when she realized that I was taking her picture. Admittedly, there is always some shock value inherent in a subject, when a camera is presented to the subject from a distance of two and half feet. This is literally, close enough to reach out and touch someone. Analogously, a street photographer shooting someone at a range of less than three feet, is reaching out and touching that subject's mind with his or her own mind. This is the "connection" I was referring to. Photographers and viewers who are less than knowledgeable, cannot appreciate the physical challenges that street photographers face when shooting subjects at close distances. Indeed, these clueless viewers and photographers may not even realize from perusing a typical street photograph, that a wide angle lens has been used. It is the wide angle lens that lends the feeling of intimacy in a street photograph that is so desirable. Longer lenses that yield similar subject-to-frame-border relationships, result in a detached feeling by comparison.

There are specialized techniques that are used in photographing street subjects at close ranges, that I've described in detail in my tutorial. In the case of "Affable" I will outline my technical approach to taking this photograph, which will encapsulate the techniques I advocate in close proximity shooting. First, I had the exposure correctly set for the immediate area of the street where this subject was, as I constantly check exposure as I walk along a street. This way, exposure is not a concern when I encounter a potential subject. Speed in execution is of the essence, after choosing a subject. A street photographer doesn't have the luxury of copious amounts of time that a landscape photographer does. The mountain will not move, but the human subject in street photography is as likely to move before the photographer is ready to make the exposure, as not. Every step must be taken to ensure that all a street photographer has to do to complete the photographic act after making a final approach to the spot chosen to shoot the subject from, is to frame the picture as previsualized, and to trip the shutter. When you reach your destination of a few feet away from the subject where you will be shooting the subject from, you don't want to be spending any time setting exposure or focus. By default, I standardize on shooting exclusivley at wide open and I recommend this. In the case of my 20mm f/4 Nikkor, it is at f/4. This way, the shutter speed can be maximized for the given light conditions for each photograph. I believe that this standardization of using the widest aperture, is critical in the success in shooting street pictures of people, who are always in flux. After I noticed this subject from a distance and decided to photographer her, I chose a distance from which I wanted to shoot her, and mentally visualized the completed image from that distance. That predetermined camera-to-subject distance was two and half feet, which I preset using the distance scale on the focusing ring of my 20mm lens, before I made my final approach.

Before I took even the first step toward the subject, I had my exposure and focus already set. I also had previsualized the final composition before approaching. I walked to the spot I chose to the subject's right, two and half feet away. I planted myself, brought the viewfinder up to my eye and framed the composition as I mentally visualized it. At this point, I had two final choices. First, I could trip the shutter and take her picture with the subject's face in profile, as she would be unaware of my presence. Alternatively, I could wait for her to become aware of my presence. In such situations, the subject then turns towards me and reacts. The latter is what I wanted. I wanted to experience and record the true emotions of the subject as she reacted to having her picture taken. For an experienced street photographer, there is a sense of slow-motion as we wait for this to happen. In actuality, this takes a split second to occur. Close proximity shooting in street photography as witnessed in the taking of "Affable" is indeed an art. The complexity of technique required to make an exposure like this, is what makes street photography such a difficult and challenging, yet greatly rewarding photographic discipline.


FINITO

shawnkraus
 
Posts: 352

Re: The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Post Mon May 25, 2009 11:33 pm


"Inspiring"

This makes me want to take a trip down city and photograph the spontaneous response of strangers.

--Shawn

mnl
 
Posts: 46

Re: The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Post Tue May 26, 2009 9:00 pm


genghis45 wrote:
The moments when strangers on the street are spontaneously caught by street photographers engaged in the acts of living out their lives,. . .

This seems to contradict:
Photography of strangers who aren't expecting to be photographed, generates the emotional impact in the street photo . . . spontaneous and real.


Absent some mystical 'vibe,' the subject is likely a) just surprised or tolerant, or b) feeling violated. Other possibilities, certainly, but "emotional bond"? That seems to be over-reaching. I generally look at your posts as I do other street photos. I wish you (and others) would let the emotional content of the photo speak for itself. Or better, include some words about the photo: Why you liked it; what was your] connection. My viewing experience feels manipulated when I'm given a title such as "affable." IMO, your technical tips are useful. OTOH some of your posted photos miss the high technical quality of the shot you posted here.

Street photos are great fun, often interesting, and on the rarest of occasions, artful. But sometimes a photo is just a photo.
All M8. Mostly 28 2.5 Elmarit http://www.pbase.com/mnl/photo_diary

genghis45
 
Posts: 5154

Re: The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Post Wed May 27, 2009 7:53 am


shawnkraus wrote:"Inspiring"

This makes me want to take a trip down city and photograph the spontaneous response of strangers.

--Shawn


Do it.

Image

cjetko
 
Posts: 3

Re: The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Post Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:06 am


What about release forms? I always carry them with me and then rarely have the nerve to ask someone to sign given that they ALWAYS want to read EVERY word.

soenda
 
Posts: 1390

Re: Releases and Street Photography

Post Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:01 am


I'm not an attorney, so I can't give you a legal opinion. However, it's my impression that you would need releases only if you intended to sell the photos or use them for commercial purposes. News photos are considered editorial, so no releases are needed for images that go to the newspaper or news magazines. The details may differ from country to country, but it's said that people can have no expectation of privacy in public, so their images are not protected. You can snap away, although you might have some annoyed subjects to contend with.

Recently some places in the US---Michigan or Ohio, I think---have made it illegal to annoy people in public. Photographers expressed concern that this would include annoying them by taking their pictures. Seems to be awfully vague for actual enforcement to me---but then, I'm not a lawyer.

IOW, you could take a photo of Madonna if you saw her on the sidewalk. You could provide the photo to a newspaper without a release, even receiving compensation for it since the newspaper use would be editorial. But you couldn't advertise and sell "pictures of Madonna" or sell Madonna's likeness to a company for use in promoting their product. For those ends you need permission in the form of a release.

Personally, I am reluctant to take a photo of an unwilling subject. I frequently ask permission, especially in really close quarters. This is in contrast to the way Genghis, the OP here, works. Of course, I don't get anything like the same range of expression and emotion that he does. Some of G.'s shots of people who live on the street are piercingly intimate and fine photographs. But I guess each of us decides where we want to draw the line.

genghis45
 
Posts: 5154

Re: The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Post Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:27 am


cjetko wrote:What about release forms? I always carry them with me and then rarely have the nerve to ask someone to sign given that they ALWAYS want to read EVERY word.


Soenda is correct. Laws may vary according to region, but where I live permission is only necessary when the resulting photos are to be used for commercial purposes.

ti_malice
 
Posts: 13

Re: Releases and Street Photography

Post Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:23 am


When next you travel and photograph in any one of the 27 EU (European Union/EEC) member countries, keep the following in mind:

"Concerning your question on the need of permission to take a picture of somebody in order to put it on a public website, I would like to inform you that taking a picture of a well visible and identified person (not in the course of a purely personal or household activity) is a processing of personal data and as such is subject to the provisions of the data protection directive 95/46/EC.

According to art.7 of the Directive, personal data may be processed only if the data subject has unambiguously given his consent or if one or more of the exceptions of the consent principle are applicable (performance of a contract, compliance with legal obligation, protection of vital interests of the data subject, public interest, legitimate interest of the data controller etc.).

The above principles are indeed mandatory for all MS.

So, the answer to your question is that the permission of the person is needed.

Best regards

Philippos MITLETTON

European Commission
Directorate General Justice, Freedom & Security
Directorate C: Civil justice, rights & citizenship
Unit C5: Data protection"

TV coverage of a beach scene never fails to zero in on a few obviously very flattered and pleased mono-kinied i.e. (topless) beauties (and, some time, not-so-beauties). I walk around with my puny D300 and am suspiciously eyed as a dirty old pervert on the prowl .
So it goes...
JJV


Board index Photography Artistic Questions The Art Of Close Proximity Shooting In Street Photography.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests