Board index PBase PaD Discussion Keep your "privates" in your private gallery!

PaD Discussion

Keep your "privates" in your private gallery!

discuss photo-a-day projects
jude_53
 
Posts: 383


Post Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:45 pm


:wink: Aestus!

Sure, Jeanne... always a camera woman.. never the wielder of naughty things.

Sigh...

loren_x
 
Posts: 2


Post Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:19 pm


PaD gallerys stream provides context.
You provide content.
Context is to some measure a set of rules
sometimes with an administration.

No matter whether I like to have my nude child cuddle next to my nude body while we sing about the clouds, or you provide clowns on birthdays is no matter...we will carry on...

Over the span of the whole world and the whole of time and circumstance...anything goes. The collected minds of people
gather and dictate whether it is black or white or grey.

I am fortunate, my time and place is peaceful etc.

It may come to pass that my feeling about PaD is that it smears all things altogether and becomes nothing in particular...that's OK...I just log into those that I feel something for...like usual.

You all sound rather beautiful

:D

gpaai
 
Posts: 904
Location: Irvine, California


Post Sun Jan 23, 2005 5:57 pm


Hahaha! How funny! My wife just received an interoffice memorandum at the end of last week. The notice was a "do's and don't's" letter involving computer use while on the job. Though it was quite detailed, these are the two that will no longer allow her to view my images while at work.

1. Management Review and Privacy:
At any time and without prior notice, "The Company" reserves the right to examine electronic mail messages, files on personal computers, web browser cashe files, web browser bookmatks, logs of web sites visited, computer system configurations, and other information or data stored on or passing through "The Company" computers or network.

and

4. Offensive Web Sites:
"The Company" is not responsible for the content that workers may encounter when they use the Internet. When and if users make a connection with web sites containing objectional content, they must promptly move to another site or terminate their session. Workers using Company computers who discover they have connected with a web site that contains sexually explicit, racist, sexist, violent, or other potentially offensive material must immediately disconnect from that site.

It went on to say that they would implement blocks if neccesary.

Unfortunately for my wife, even though she just logs on to my galleries, her employer looks at the entire site. This is one of the reasons I may be moving on and creating my own web site (well and to be able to represent my work in a more professional setting). I certainly hope the friends I have made here will visit it from time to time. :(

Gary
I love photoshopography.......

slowpokebill
 
Posts: 53


Post Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:49 pm


sexually explicit, racist, sexist, violent, or other potentially offensive


Boy that is about as broad and could be interpreted to ban just about any web site, especially the "potentially offensive" part. Almost anything offends someone; so, anything could be considered "potentially offensive".

One like this http://www.bibleontheweb.com/Bible.asp would or could fall under each and every one of those categories. To bad I have always found it to be interesting reading. So, I'll stay happily self employed.

Bill
http://www.pbase.com/slowpokebill

gpaai
 
Posts: 904
Location: Irvine, California


Post Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:19 pm


slowpokebill wrote:Boy that is about as broad and could be interpreted to ban just about any web site, especially the "potentially offensive" part. http://www.pbase.com/slowpokebill


Yeah! Unfortunately I don't make the rules, nor do I sign her paycheck. And believe me, she makes way too much money for me to worry about PBase. Besides, I have been procrastinating way too long. While I do ok at the moment, I want to one day soon carry that self employed banner you proudly speak of. One of the ways I see to do it is the way so many of the professionals have been telling me lately... A personal web site WOULD allow ME to make the rules.

Gary
I love photoshopography.......

chawkins
 
Posts: 21


Post Mon Jan 24, 2005 4:55 pm


Gary, no reason why you can't have both a personal/professional Web site and continue on PBase. I'm currently working on my company Web site and will use some of the photos I've put on PBase as portfolio material. There's no reason to ever mention PBase to my clients. I need Somewhere I can express my feelings.
Cheryl

gpaai
 
Posts: 904
Location: Irvine, California


Post Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:46 pm


chawkins wrote:Gary, no reason why you can't have both a personal/professional Web site and continue on PBase. I'm currently working on my company Web site and will use some of the photos I've put on PBase as portfolio material. There's no reason to ever mention PBase to my clients. I need Somewhere I can express my feelings.
Cheryl


Hi Cheryl,

I'm thinking about keeping my PBase account alive simply because it is a pretty cheap Online photo storage site. With the way my schedule has been, and looks in the future, I may not be as active though, and will most likely make future galleries private to store personal files I have been spending a lot of hours on.

Gary
I love photoshopography.......

thejerk
 
Posts: 166


Post Sat Feb 12, 2005 2:35 am


jeannius wrote:...
We will NEVER all agree!!

That's what makes life so...............interesting!!


Bravo Jeanne! Well said.

Regards Bill :)

jude_53
 
Posts: 383


Post Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:17 pm


I've decided to do a seperate gallery, too... For job-landing purposes. I'm going for a newspaper job and I'm a little afraid my lack of shirt might scare them..

wait.. maybe it'll HELP!!!! EUREKA!

scottclarke
 
Posts: 11

Nudity

Post Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:09 pm


My problem is I have photos of my two year old child on my PAD. The
photos where she is in the bath or partially naked get four times the hits as other photos. My wife wants me to remove them, I want to monitor it further. I think it does speak for it's self. Some what concerning.

natalia
 
Posts: 24


Post Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:44 pm


jude_53 wrote:
Sigh... there goes my PAD for tomorrow..


Ha-ha-ha, jude :lol:

twdarby
 
Posts: 38


Post Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:32 pm


Gary's comment about his wife's company monitoring websites employees visited made me chuckle. I work for a local government and manage the wastewater department. Try searching for "manhole covers" when there's a filter system already in place, LOL. Needless to say they've since completely removed the filtering software!!

tom

clickaway
 
Posts: 2689


Post Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:27 pm


I used to work in local government too.

We had some software that filtered out e-mails with rude words in them.

My boss had to think really hard why a mail talking about the town of Scunthorpe was being firewalled. :roll:

adalberto_tiburzi
 
Posts: 897


Post Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:01 pm


My "Yes, I love Black & White" gallery is in the Google list of interracial porn sites.
I have changed in "I like" but seems useless.
I'll try "BW"
No kidding :oops:
8) Adal

stormseye
 
Posts: 240


Post Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:19 pm


Adal!

Photography has finally made you famous!

May your fame and fortune "spread far & wide." ;)

Love ya, "Big Guy"!


:lol:
Bruce B

"I have always felt that it is HOW one sees
rather than WHAT one sees
that makes any photograph interesting."
- Michael A. Smith, 1999

PreviousNext

Board index PBase PaD Discussion Keep your "privates" in your private gallery!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest