bobfloyd wrote:bobt54 wrote:clickaway wrote:There's a clear difference between the two images.
Ray Akey's was art.
Ok. A rather subjective answer, don't you think?
What made Ray's image art and the other image not, other than because you said so?
Maybe subjective for you but I agree with Ray. This image was crude, rude and socially unacceptable to all but the most base elements of society. It was something from someone's porn collection while Ray Akey's image was an artistic treatment of the female form. Surely you can see the difference between the two shots?
I see a great differences between them and, personally, I would even categorize Ray's image as art. But just because it is arguably art, does that automatically make it "socially acceptable" in all situations and societies?
Gary mentioned being responsible when posting. Nice idea in theory but is there anyone out there really doing this?