Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:43 pm sbbish wrote:
It seems clear you did not get the responses you were wanting and this has made you unhappy. You will do what you want.
Most unfortunately what is most clear to you is not the actual fact. Just see the above post by "pbaseguy". Now it has become an arena of personal attack... that's why I was not happy.
It's a great forum.... I didn't have an iota of idea. That's why I said it was my mistake to start a thread in this forum. People have unnamed empty gallery account to fight in this forum. Do you think the man who has an empty gallery is bothered about the topic being discussed here ??
I started to receive many "guest comments" saying many bad things just after starting this thread. If people have something to say why can't they come with their names and identities ??
And the most surprising thing to me, in this discussion, was the mismatch between the words being told here and the actual activities going on in the PaD meta gallery..... I am not saying that who posted here they are also posting multiple times. I am only trying to say that still a large fraction of the PaD gallery users are posting multiple times and it has been happening since I have started to watch the PaD gallery.... And it seems that the people who are so actively protesting here did not even post a request or took any initiative to say people what is the "right spirit" of the PaD gallery and what is "abusing" the system. But now after my post many of them are so aggressive that they are ready to attack me personally.
Can the moderator please hear this request to lock this thread ?? Or do they support those anonymous personal attacking post and guest comments ?? Is it not abusing the system ??
Anyway, whether they lock it or not, I am not watching this topic now on. So whatever will be addressed to me will remain unseen. If you are really interested in saying something send me a PM, but not a guest comment.
regards,