donna_lear wrote:I had one gallery go absolutely wild for a few days - literally thousands of hits every time I looked at it. I accidentally discovered I got a mention on a porn site because I called the images in it "Voyeur shots" - not thinking of the implications of that when I did it. They're just all candids - mostly on the street, sometimes in other places. No nudity.
I pictured all these people hot-footing it over from the porn site to have a look at my voyeur shots and wondering why there were no up-the-skirt pics and why everyone had their clothes on.
Donna
Donna hit the nail on the head!
This is exactly the point. Everyone, obviously like the idea to receive visits to their own galleries and to imagine that visitors feel like looking at their pictures and maybe appreciate that.
But when only the gallery, I mean the thumbnails page, gets hits, while every single picture has very few and there are no comments at all (to the gallery in the whole and to some pictures), then I think one has not any reason to feel very gratified, because the number of hits can depend on a misunderstanding in the title, related with a search engine, which leads there people who were looking for…something totally different.
One of my gallery has a very high number of hits, it’s not one of my best galleries, according to my opinion, even though I always try to post pictures which are not totally ugly snapshot, because I love photography and I have respect for it, also if I’m just an amateur, without any presumption.
This gallery has the word “Girlsâ€