Board index ‹ Equipment ‹ Digital Cameras ‹ Tamron Di II 18-250 or Sigma 18-200 OS for Canon?
blackadder41 wrote:Thanks Dave, very helpful. I'm assuming you mean the 28-300mm, or is there a 24-300mm that I've missed? Not sure if I'd miss the 18-28 range, but I could keep my 18-55 lens to give me the flexibility. Options, options! Cheers
blackadder41 wrote:Hi Dave,
Your advice has been really helpful, many thanks.
Yes, I am still quite torn between the Sigma 18-200OS, Tamron 28-300VC and Tamron 18-250. There are advantages and disadvantages to them all. And I want the advantages of them all put together!! I'll need to comprimise somwhere along the line, so taking a bit more time to consider what I'll get best value and use of is definately a must. It is the range that I am currently wanting the most without swapping lenses all the time, but if I get really inferior quality I'm sure I will regret spending the money if the quality is compromised too much. I'm leaning much more towards having OS/VC/IS though as I do think this seems to be fairly critical.
Thanks for your support.
Carol
blackadder41 wrote:Hi Dave,
Tamron 18-250. There are advantages and disadvantages to them all. And I want the advantages of them all put together!!
Board index ‹ Equipment ‹ Digital Cameras ‹ Tamron Di II 18-250 or Sigma 18-200 OS for Canon?
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 2 guests