Tue Feb 26, 2008 10:35 am
I have to agree that a 28 at the wide end give a very cramped range... for my style of shooting.
A wide to normal angle or wide to short telephoto zoom is, for most people, their real swiss army knife lens and were the real money should be spent. (with the obvious exception of wildlife and sports photographers)
My shooting style I find that about with a 1.6 crop camera 80% of the time I'm using 35mm (56mm equivalent) or wider ( and usually a _lot_ wider) for most of my walk around/holiday camera work and as such my 17 -35 is left on the main body most of the time.
My first digital, a 1.6 crop d60 canon, using a 28-70 L despite being a very versatile lens on a full frame film body left me with a gapping inability to do landscape and even most "snapshot" work.... a used Sigma 14mm prime filled that hole but still.... when my D60 failed in Japan (after I was caught out in 8 hours of in torrential monsoon rain) the replacement 20D I bought there was unable to use the 14mm Sigma lens (needed a, by then, unavailable rechip) I found myself often totally unable to shoot far too many scenes.
Also $220CND, even with the much lower prices you pay in north american is almost certainly not going to get you a lens that is any real or significant upgrade from your kit lens.
If you go with either of the option you listed don't sell your kit lens until you eventually upgrade at the wider end.
As a stop gap between kit and quality glass there's always the used market, no shortage of lenses in local trading press or even ebay being sold off as people move up or give up the hobby.
My choice I guess would be to save up and get the EF-S 17-85 IS or the almost an "L" 17-55 IS or, as I actually did, look for used glass.
there is no .sig