Board index Equipment Digital Cameras Thoughts on Canons

Digital Cameras

Thoughts on Canons

prinothcat
 
Posts: 662


Post Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:48 pm


marxz wrote:oh i see our little 'tarded canona spammer is back, new suffix, same spam

... and my god and they actually managed to accidentally post (1 out of 8 so far for this new account) of their latest spams in a some what appropriate thread... wonders never cease


hmm this is in regard to a 5, that's FIVE, year old posting in a 5 year old thread.....

marxz
 
Posts: 282


Post Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:38 am


prinothcat wrote:
marxz wrote:oh i see our little 'tarded canona spammer is back, new suffix, same spam

... and my god and they actually managed to accidentally post (1 out of 8 so far for this new account) of their latest spams in a some what appropriate thread... wonders never cease


hmm this is in regard to a 5, that's FIVE, year old posting in a 5 year old thread.....


actually the spammer in question posted only a few hours before I did... not the 5 years ogo when the thread originated, though reluctant credit for the tenacity of searching that far back.... ah well looks like the moderators finally decided to kill his posts. I like pbase but as a moderator on more than a dozen other (non photographic) forums I personally think they can be, at times, (though not this time) painfully slow picking out and deleting the spam.
there is no .sig

dougj
 
Posts: 2276


Post Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:44 am


The threads from the spammer were reported a 2-3 days ago, it takes about a day to get the posts deleted.

prinothcat
 
Posts: 662


Post Sun Feb 03, 2008 7:27 pm


ah ha my apologies, Since by the time I got here the post was gone already, so your post made no sense to me.

Previous

Board index Equipment Digital Cameras Thoughts on Canons

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 2 guests