Hi,
Through reviews and descriptions, the Canon 10D is more durable than the 300D Digital rebel. But my photo advisor told me that in the long run, niether camera is more survivable than the other. Now I am not good at physics, but his remarks got me curious. Here is what he says:
Digital rebel: If the camera recieves a shocking blow, the plastic body will shatter, absorbing the concussion. This results in the body ruined and the camera out of service, although the internal parts may survive.
EOS 10D : When given a blow, the magnesium alloy body resists the damage, reducing the chances of a breakage however, when it resists the shock, the concussion would attack the interior of the camera, damaging vital components such as the chip.
In his conclusion, there is a trade of with plastic and magnesium alloy and niether the Rebel or the 10D should be considered more durable than the other.
In my conclusion no matter what camera you have, if you have shaky hands or have a high record of clumsy breakage, you should not handle some $1000 + precision instrument.
What do you fellow photographers think?
Hugh