Page 2 of 2

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:45 am
by madlights
Thanks everyone for their assessments. I've also been wondering whether to upgrade from CS and didn't think CS2 was a big enough jump to warrant. But it's sounding like CS3 is if only for the RAW processing alone....I tried the beta lightroom and kind of figured a person might like it after time and getting used to. I just found it too 'different' in it's organizing structure to catch on to quickly. It was easy to use in processing photos themselves however.

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 10:54 pm
by sheila
The new Quick Selection tool is absolutely amazing in CS3.

Cheers
Sheila

RAW Support for Canon 40D

PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:30 pm
by brode2
Adobe is trying to force me to upgrade my CS2 to CS3 because my new Canon 40D is not supported for RAW processing by CS2.....can you believe it? As a result I'm using the software that shipped with the 40D to process my RAW files, Digital Photo Professional. It works, but is more cumbersome. Adobe said I should use their DNG Converter, but I'm not crazy about that solution.

In your opinions, if I did upgrade for RAW processing, should I go to LightRoom or CS3?

Re: RAW Support for Canon 40D

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:38 am
by sheila
brode2 wrote:.

In your opinions, if I did upgrade for RAW processing, should I go to LightRoom or CS3?


I would definitely go for CS3 rather than Lightroom. In fact, I am going to remove Lightroom from my PC as it constantly opens when I download images to my hard drive when I have specifically asked it not to! (Properties : Do Nothing when uploading")

Cheers
Sheila

Re: RAW Support for Canon 40D

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 4:08 am
by dougj
brode2 wrote:Adobe is trying to force me to upgrade my CS2 to CS3 because my new Canon 40D is not supported for RAW processing by CS2.....can you believe it? As a result I'm using the software that shipped with the 40D to process my RAW files, Digital Photo Professional. It works, but is more cumbersome. Adobe said I should use their DNG Converter, but I'm not crazy about that solution.

In your opinions, if I did upgrade for RAW processing, should I go to LightRoom or CS3?


That is Adobe's common practice, they try to force users to buy a PS upgrade just for the version of ACR that works with the new bodies. They've done this for years. ACR is nice, but DPP is not too bad.

A lot of folks use a RAW processor separate from Adobe and Canon.